Step-rate-test as one of the strategies for managing formation water injection. Design and monitoring
https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2024-1-71-79
Abstract
The construction of a produced water management (PWM) system relies on a Step-rate-test strategy that integrates a novel technology for treating the bottomhole formation zone and adjacent fractures resulting from prior hydraulic fracturing. Step-rate-test technology is considered more environmentally friendly than hydraulic fracturing for several reasons. It doesn't require crosslinkers or proppants, and there is no discharge of liquids or other reagents onto the terrain or into water basins. This article discusses technical approaches to solving field service problems in injection wells. One of the strategies for managing produced water injection is Step-rate-test, which is considered the best choice in these operations. This strategy can also be used to solve the problem of disposing of excess fluid or waste after hydraulic fracturing. Advances in modelling, operation, monitoring, and evaluation provide the basis for minimising costs and preserving the environment. The connection between the object of work and the engineering works is established through quality targets and pumping requirements. Field example, such as Tevlinsko-Russkinskoye and Yuzhno-Yagunskoye, and results of data mining of them, demonstrate the significant impact of data differences on site selection. Field data indicates that injectivity decreases in matrix injection structures despite the injection of prepared fluid. It is acceptable to inject the fluid without prior preparation, provided that there is no well pad pump station, pipe end phase divider or similar equipment. The majority of rock structures become fractured during fluid injection, which affects the selection of technical equipment for the process. This article evaluates the propagation of fractures during the injection of prepared and unprepared fluids and their impact on well performance.
About the Authors
R. R. AlekberovRussian Federation
Rashit R. Alekberov, Process En- gineer, EPU Service LLC, Kogalym; Master's Student, Applicant Candidate of Engineering, Industrial University of Tyumen
A. A. Volf
Russian Federation
Albert A. Volf, Candidate of Physics and Mathematics, Associate Pro- fessor at the Department of Development and Exploitation of Oil and Gas Fields
References
1. Baikov, V. A., Davletbaev, A. Ya., Asmandiyarov, R. N., Usmanov, T. S., & Stepanova, Z. Yu. (2011). Special well tests to fractured water injection wells. Neftegazovoye delo, (1). (In Russian). Available at: http://ogbus.ru/issue/view/issue12011
2. Davletbaev, A. Ya., Asalkhuzina, G. F., Ivaschenko, D. S., Fedorov, A. I., Fursov, G. A., Nazargalin, E. R.,… Valeeva, E. Z. (2015). Methods of research for the development of spontaneous growth of induced fractures during flooding in low permeability reservoirs. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference. Moscow. (In Russian). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2118/176562-MS
3. Salimov, O. V., Girfanov, I. I., Kochetkov, A. V., Ziyatdinov, R. Z., & Morozov, P. G. (2016). The influence of thermoelastic effect on cracks of automatic hydraulic fracturing in injection wells. Georesources, 18(1), pp. 46-50. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18599/grs.18.1.8
4. Cheng, A. H.-D. (2016). Poroelasticity. Cham, Springer, 877 p. (In English). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25202-5
5. Clifford, P. J. (1989). Simulation of waterflood fracture growth with coupled fluid flow, temperature and rock elasticity. ECMOR I 1st European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery. Cambridge. (In English). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201411304
Review
For citations:
Alekberov R.R., Volf A.A. Step-rate-test as one of the strategies for managing formation water injection. Design and monitoring. Oil and Gas Studies. 2024;(1):71-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2024-1-71-79