Preview

Oil and Gas Studies

Advanced search

A case study of predicting net reservoirs within J2 unit of the Tyumen formation of polyfacial genesis in the territory of the Uvat project

https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2024-4-36-49

Abstract

On the periphery of the West Siberian Basin, up to 30 % of J2-4 reservoirs within the Malyshev horizon of the Tyumen formation cannot be predicted correctly. The reasons include the low exploration degree of the territories by deep wells, which is why the net reservoirs are predicted based on 3D seismic data, and poor seismic resolution against the size of traps in the Tyumen formation. The article presents a case study of the application of geological and geophysical, seismic materials related to the Uvat area in the south of Tyumen region. The aim is to describe the lessons learned when addressing the reservoir forecasting issue associated with one of the Tyumen formation reservoirs (J2) of complex (coastal-transitional and continental) genesis. The article describes the technologies applied by the Tyumen Petroleum Research Center LLC to estimate net pays based on 3D seismic data. A complex of main geological and seismic factors that control the forecasts of thin terrigenous reservoirs based on seismic data is considered. These include the structure of the J2 unit (vertical features of net reservoir evolution), the effect of carbon content, the issues of separating net-reservoir and non-reservoir rock by petroelastic properties, etc. The results of the analysis presented in this article are employed actively in the context of geological exploration and the identification of priority traps in the Tyumen formation within the territory of the Uvat project.

About the Authors

O. V. Elisheva
Tyumen Petroleum Research Center LLC
Russian Federation

Olga V. Elisheva, Expert in Geology

Tyumen



A. V. Shakhov
Tyumen Petroleum Research Center LLC
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Shakhov, Chief Sector inter-pretation of geological support of the SRR

Tyumen



References

1. Zverev, K. V., Matigorov, A. A., Chukhlantsev, E. R., & Greg, N. A. (2006). Petrofizicheskaya kharakteristika produktivnykh gorizontov tyumenskoy svity yugo-vostochnoy chasti Uvatskogo rayona. Puti realizatsii neftegazovogo potentsiala KhMAO: sbornik trudov devyatoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Tom 2. Khanty-Mansiysk, IzdatNaukaServis Publ., pp. 260-267. (In Russian).

2. Elisheva, O. V., Lazar, E. L., Lyzhin, E. A., Safonov, V. G., Zhidkov, A. V., & Zhestkov, D. N. (2020). The methodology of Adaptation for searching new hydrocarbon in the Jurassic and Neocomian sediments of the Uvat project areas by the results of the exploration 2015-2019. Oil Industry, (11), pp. 32-37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24887/0028-2448-2020-11-32-37

3. Baraboshkin, E. Yu. (2007). Prakticheskaya sedimentologiya (terrigennye kollektora). Tomsk, 155 p. (In Russian).

4. Gavrilova, E. N., Slavkin, V. S., & Ermolova, T. E. (2010). Reservoir distribution regularities in Tyumen suite deposits on the west of latitudinal Priobie. Russian oil and gas geology, (3), pp. 52-60. (In Russian).

5. Loginov, D. V., & Lavrik, S. A. (2010). Some methods of determining an informative set of seismic attributes for forecasting reservoir properties. Petroleum geology. Theoretical and applied studies, 5(1), pp. 10. (In Russian).

6. Melnikov, A. V., Koryakov, D. A., & Miryasova, Ya. A. (2022). Terrigenous Mirador formation of Alturitas field, Venezuela: application of acoustic inversion. Russian oil and gas geology, (5), pp. 39-49. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31087/0016-7894-2022-5-39-49

7. Romanenko, M. Yu., Kerusov, I. N., Miroshnichenko, D. E., & Masalkin, Yu. V. (2010). Valuation of the effectiveness of the method of synchronous inversion of seismic data in relation to modeling of low-contrast speakers. Technologies of seismic exploration, (2), pp. 55-61. (In Russian).

8. Timchuk, A. S., Kostyuchenko, S. V., & Smirnov, V. N. (2011). Seismic inversion transformations for specifying the geological models and designing the hydrocarbon field development. Vestnik TSKR Rosnedra, (2), рp. 11-16. (In Russian).

9. Stolbova, N. F., Bether, O. V., & Kiselyov, Yu. V. (2004). Lithogenesis of Jurassic-Cretaceous deposits of the eastern boron of the Bolshekhetskaya depression (based on the results of studying the section of the Tukolando-Vandinskaya parametric well-320). Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University, 307(6), pp. 31-35. (In Russian).

10. Kochegurov, A. I., Kochegurova, E. A., Ilyasova, I. E., Geringer, V., & Reif, K. (2017). Phase-frequency deconvolution of seismic waves. Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, 328(12), pp. 84-93. (In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Elisheva O.V., Shakhov A.V. A case study of predicting net reservoirs within J2 unit of the Tyumen formation of polyfacial genesis in the territory of the Uvat project. Oil and Gas Studies. 2024;(4):36-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2024-4-36-49

Views: 145


ISSN 0445-0108 (Print)