Optimization of field development scheme parameters using multivariant simulation and neural proxy-model
https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2025-2-98-108
Abstract
This article presents an approach for determining the optimal parameters of a reservoir development system, based on a series of multivariate hydrodynamic simulations aimed at model adaptation and forecasting of technological indicators, incorporating neural network analysis. The rationale behind this algorithm is to enhance the accuracy and reliability of results during the early stages of design by simultaneously accounting for geological and hydrodynamic uncertain-ties. The software "tNavigator" was selected as the primary tool due to its extensive feature set tailored for this task. Using the Latin Hypercube algorithm, we conducted a multivariate adaptation of the initial hydrodynamic model. By analyzing the quality of the resulting model, we selected representative implementations for the baseline forecast. Based on the outcomes of baseline forecast and using the accumulated distribution function, we identified pessimistic, baseline, and optimistic scenarios for optimization calculations. These calculations were aimed at finding the most effective development system using the differential evolution algorithm.
To ensure quality control and refine the optimal parameters obtained, we constructed a neural proxy model. According to the results of the study, we developed a procedure for obtaining desired estimates, which combines a wide range of uncertainties that define the variety of obtained solutions while also reducing the computational time required for simulations.
About the Author
D. V. BalinRussian Federation
Daniil V. Balin, Post-graduate Student, Development and Exploitation of Oil and Gas Fields
Tyumen
References
1. Popkov, V. I. & Shakshin, V. P. (2009). Integrated geological and hydrodynamic modeling in the management system of oil and gas production. Journal of Samara state technical university. Ser. Physical and mathematical sciences, 1 (18), pp. 239-250. (In Russian).
2. Kozyrev, N. D., Vishnyakov, A. Y., & Putilov, I. S. (2020). Assessment of the uncertainty parameters influence on the development indicators forecasting. Perm Journal of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, 20 (4), pp. 356-368. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15593/2712-8008/2020.4.5
3. Andronov, S. A., Gorenkova, E. A., Gomonov, A. A., & Maksimenko, I. A. (2023). Approaches to selection of realizations in probabilistic modeling of geological model and analysis of influence of forecast production profile. PRONEFT. Professionally about oil, 8(4(30)), pp. 25-32. (In Russian). DOI: 10.51890/2587-7399-2023-8-4-25-32
4. Kazanskaya, D. A., & Krasnikov, S. S. (2024). Integrirovannoe geologo-gidrodinamicheskoe modelirovanie v PO «tNavigator». Aktual’nye trendy nauchno-tekhnologicheskogo i operacionnogo razvitiya neftegazovoj otrasli. Sbornik materialov konferencii. Tyumen. Mosсow, Geomodel' Razvitie Publ., pp. 207-210. (In Russian).
5. Pyrikov, V. A. (2024). Povyshenie effektivnosti zakachki na osnove geologo-tekhnologicheskogo modelirovaniya s uchetom rezul’tatov nejrosetevoy oprimizacii. Onlajn-forum «Innovacii dlya povysheniya effektivnosti soprovozhdeniya neftegazovykh aktivov». Sbornik dokladov. October, 2024. Moscow, pp. 200-202. (In Russian).
6. Sadykov, R. M. (2022). Optimal number of Monte-Carlo simulations for hydrocarbon resources probabilistic estimation. Kazakhstan journal for oil & gas industry, 4(4), pp. 32-44. (In Russian). DOI: 10.54859/kjogi108590
7. Mohamed, L., Christie, M., & Demyanov, V. (2011). History matching and uncertainty quantification: multiobjective particle swarm optimization approach. In SPE Europec featured at EAGE Conference and Exhibition, pp. SPE-143067 MS. (In English). DOI: 10.2118/143067-MS
8. Umanovskiy, A. V. (2022). Proxy modeling of reservoir hydrodynamics with graph neural networks. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Fiziko-matematicheskoe modelirovanie. Physical and mathematical modeling. Oil, gas, energy, (3), pp.155-177. (In Russian). DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2022-8-3-155-177
9. Shchelokov, A. S., Turchak, A. A., & Saltykov, A. V. (2020). Study of the change in the learning rate by an algorithm of resilient propagation of the error RPROP. Nedelya nauki Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo morskogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 1(3-1), pp. 3-9. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Balin D.V. Optimization of field development scheme parameters using multivariant simulation and neural proxy-model. Oil and Gas Studies. 2025;(2):98-108. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2025-2-98-108