Improving risk management in the transport of petroleum product
https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2020-3-120-127
Abstract
The article discusses the issues of risk management in the road transport of petroleum product. We analyze the main risk assessment methodologies; propose to use the hierarchy analysis method to improve quantitative risk assess ment. The identification and assessment of risks are one of the key points in the development of preventive measures to reduce accidents. The use of traditional methods for risk analysis and assessment has a drawback in that they don't imply the possibility of ranking risk assessment criteria by importance depending on the specifics of the task being solved. Because of the fact that calculations are in relative units, the issue of ranking risks to critical, significant and insignificant is solved automatically.
About the Authors
V. E. OvsyannikovRussian Federation
Victor E. Ovsyannikov, Candidate of Engineering, Associate Professor at the Department of Technology of Mechanical Engineering
Tyumen
A. N. Shiryaeva
Russian Federation
Anna N. Shiryaeva, Master's Student at the Department of Road Transport
KurganD. G. Dzhindzholava
Russian Federation
Davidi G. Dzhindzholava, Master's Student at the Department of Technology of Mechanical Engineering
Tyumen
I. M. Mustafin
Russian Federation
Ilgiz M. Mustafin, Assistant at the Department of Technology of Mechanical Engineering
Tyumen
O. Yu. Teplouhov
Russian Federation
Oleg Yu. Teplouhov, Associate Professor at the Department of Technology of Mechanical Engineering
Tyumen
References
1. Bykanova, N. I., & Miroshnichenko, V. V. (2016). Sovremennye problemy razvitiya segmenta transportirovki nefti i nefteproduktov v Rossii. Novaya nauka: teoreticheskiy i prakticheskiy vzglyad, (8(88)), pp. 257-261. (In Russian).
2. Ochkalova, A. (2016). Statistics of accident and measures to reduce emergency for the transportation of dangerous goods. Vestnik universiteta, (6), pp. 92-97. (In Russian).
3. Repin, V. V., & Eliferov, V. G. (2019). Biznes-protsessy: reglamentatsiya i upravlenie. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 319 p. (In Russian).
4. Antonov, G. D., Ivanova, O. P., & Tumin, V. M. (2015). Upravlenie riskami organizatsii. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 153 p. (In Russian).
5. Baranov, Yu. N., & Tryastsyn, A. P. (2010). Analiz i otsenka riska pri perevozke opasnykh gruzov avtomobil'nym transportom v APK. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, (5(26)), pp. 29-33. (In Russian).
6. Korotchenko, E. A., & Petrunina, Y. L. (2016). The Method of Risk Assessment "Criteria. Events. Rules". International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 4(5), pp. 52-57. (In Russian).
7. Gurnovich, T. G., Ostapenko, E. A., & Molchalenko, S. A. (2019). Otsenka i analiz riskov. Moscow, Knorus, 252 p. (In Russian).
8. Vyatkin, V. N., Gamza, V. A., Ekaterinoslavskiy, Yu. Yu., & Ivanushko, P. N. (2006). Upravlenie riskami firmy: programmy integrativnogo risk-menedzhmenta. Moscow, Finansy i statistika Publ., 400 p. (In Russian).
9. Kopeykin, G. K., & Potemkin, V. K. (2004). Menedzhment ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti. St. Petersburg, Tertsiya Publ., 112 p. (In Russian).
10. Lanskov, A. V., Fomin, E. P., & Chumak, V. A. (2011). Risk v predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti. Ekonomika i upravlenie. Ekonomicheskie nauki, (11). (In Russian). Available at: http://ecsn.ru/files/pdf/201111/201111_155.pdf
11. Lapusta, M. G., & Sharshukova, L. G. (1998). Riski v predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti. Moscow, INFRA-M, 203 p. (In Russian).
12. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston and New York, Houghton Mifflin company, 388 p. (In English). Available at: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/books/risk/riskuncertaintyprofit.pdf
13. Tepman, L. N. (2002). Riski v ekonomike. Moscow, Yuniti-Dana Publ., 380 p. (In Russian).
14. Pickford, J. (Ed.). (2001). Mastering Risk. Volume 1: Concepts. Edinburgh, Pearson Education Limited, 326 p. (In English).
15. Bakirov, I. K., & Zagidullina, A. R. (2017). Analysis of a method for determining the estimated values of fire risk on industrial facilities. Oil and Gas Studies, (2), pp. 101-108. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31660/0445-0108-2017-2-101-108
16. Hasanov, T. I., Kurkin, A. A., Fedorov, S. A., Zyza, E. A., & Ponomarenko, V. A. (2016). Structure uncertainties influence on geological risks. Oil and Gas Studies, (2), pp. 32-40. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31660/0445-0108-2016-2-32-40
17. Leontiev, D. S., Kleschenko, I. I., & Zhaparova, D. V. (2016). Analysis of methods for justifying and making decisions at realizing geological and engineering actions aimed at water influx restriction. Oil and Gas Studies, (1), pp. 53-61. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31660/0445-0108-2016-1-53-61
18. Aleksandrova, E. V., & Ovsyannikov, V. E. (2017). Upravlenie riskami v sisteme menedzhmenta kachestva obrazovatel'noy organizatsii. Aktual'nye voprosy menedzhmenta i sistemkachestva: materialy regional' noynauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Kurgan, pp. 3-5. (In Russian).
19. Ovsyannikov, V. E., & Vasil'ev, V. I. (2015). Ekspertnaya sistema proektirovaniya tekhnologicheskogo oborudovaniya. Inzhenernyy vestnik Dona, (1), pp. 90-95. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n1y2015/2765
20. Saati T. Decision Making. Hierarchy Analysis Method. (1988). 2nd edition. The USA. 278 p. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Ovsyannikov V.E., Shiryaeva A.N., Dzhindzholava D.G., Mustafin I.M., Teplouhov O.Yu. Improving risk management in the transport of petroleum product. Oil and Gas Studies. 2020;(3):120-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2020-3-120-127