FORMATION HYDRAULIC FRACTURING FLUID BASED ON CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE: ITS ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS, APPLICATION PROSPECTS
https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2016-2-49-57
Abstract
The article considers the advantages and limitations of hydraulic fracturing fluid based on carboxymethyl cellulose determined as a result of laboratory studies. As a result of testing the studied fluid manufacturing features compared with similar fracturing fluids it was determined that the fluid of interest can be effectively used as a fluid for formation hydraulic fracturing especially in low permeability reservoirs. This fluid is widely available and has a low cost. It can easily replace the foreign analogues.
References
1. Усачев П. М. Гидравлический разрыв пласта. - М.: Недра, 1986. - 164 с
2. Экономидес М., Олини Р., Валько П. Унифицированный дизайн гидроразрыва пласта: от теории к практике. - М.: Ижевск: Институт компьютерных исследований, 2007. - 236 с
3. Кочетков Л. М. Методы интенсификации процессов выработки остаточных запасов нефти. - Сургут: РИИЦ «Нефть Приобья», 2005. - 110 с
4. Beckwith, R. 2012. Depending On Gua For Shale Oil And Gas Development. JPetTechnol64(12): 44-55. SPE-1212- 0044-JPT
5. Perry R. H. 1997.Perry’s Chemical Engineer’s Handbook,7th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Singh, D., Russell, A., Schnoor, E. et al. 2015. Advanced Residue-Free Fracturing Fluid with Improved Friction Reduction and Exceptional Cleanup Properties.Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3-5 June. SPE-174178-MS
6. Buelichen D. and Plank, J. 2011. Formation Of Colloidal Polymer Associates From Hydroxyethyl Cellulose (HEC) And Their Role To Achieve Fluid Loss Control In Oil Well Cement. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 11-13 April. SPE-141182-MS
7. Trabelsi S. and Kakadjian, S. 2013. Comparative Study Between Guar and Carboxymethylcellulose Used as Gelling Systems in Hydraulic Fracturing Application. Presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 23-26 March.SPE-164486-MS
8. Fry, J. and Paterniti, M. 2014. Production Comparison of Hydraulic Fracturing Fluids in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations of North Dakota. Presented at the SPE Western North American and Rocky Mountain Joint Regional Meeting, Denver, Colorado, USA, 16-18 April. SPE-169580-MS
9. Wang X. and Qu, Q. 2003. Development of a Nonresidue Polymer-Based Fracturing Fluid.Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Texas, USA, 5-7 February.SPE-80227-MS
10. Wang, X., Sun, H., Zhou, J. et al. 2015. A Non-Damaging Polymer Fluid System for Conventional and Unconventional Formations.Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Budapest, Hungary, 3-5 June.SPE-174280-MS
11. Warren, B., van der Horst, P. and Stewart, W. 2003. Application of Amphoteric Cellulose Ethers in Drilling Fluids. Presented at the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, Texas, USA, 5-7 February. SPE-80210-MS
12. Weaver, J. D., Liang, F. and Schultheiss, N. C. 2013. Fracturing Fluid Conductivity Damage and Recovery Efficiency. Presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference and Exhibition, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 5-7 June. SPE-165086-MS. 165086-MS
Review
For citations:
Kalinin V.R. FORMATION HYDRAULIC FRACTURING FLUID BASED ON CARBOXYMETHYL CELLULOSE: ITS ADVANTAGES AND LIMITATIONS, APPLICATION PROSPECTS. Oil and Gas Studies. 2016;(2):49-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2016-2-49-57
Views:
510
Email this article 
Post a Comment 