Prognosis evaluation of environmental risks in case of accident on main and technological oil pipelines
https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2019-6-103-117
Abstract
The article is devoted to questions of environmental risk assessment. The subject relevance consists in normative introduction of risk assessment requirements for many activity fields connected with danger or result uncertainty. The purpose of the article is ecological damages assessment and environmental risks in case of accident on main and technological oil pipelines. A task of the study is an application possibility consideration of regulatory ecological requirements together with the environmental risks valuation methods accepted now by the oil and gas companies. During a solution of an objective the environmental risks assessment technique was developed for the ecological management systems of the oil and gas companies.
About the Authors
I. N. Kvasov
Omsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Igor N. Kvasov, Candidate of Economics, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Transport, Oil and Gas, Professor at the Department of Oil and Gas Business, Standardization and Metrology
Omsk
I. V. Shendaleva
Omsk State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena V. Shendaleva, Candidate of Engineering, Associate Professor at the Department of Oil and Gas Business, Standardization and Metrology
Omsk
O. V. Shtengauer
Omsk engine-building association of P. I. Baranov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga V. Shtengauer, Engineer-metrologist, Omsk engine-building association of P. I. Baranov branch of the Salute gas turbine engineering research and production center
Omsk
M. Yu. Zemenkova
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria Yu. Zemenkova, Candidate of Engineering, Associate Professor at the Department of Transportation of Hydrocarbon Resources
TyumenReferences
1. Ivanov, E. A., Agapov, A. A, Buyko, K. V., Genfal'd, B. Ye., Dadonov, Yu. A., Il'in, A. M.,… Pchel'nikov, A. V. (2010) Metodiki otsenki posledstviy avariy na opasnykh proizvodstvennykh ob''yektakh: sbornik dokumentov. Seriya 27. Vypusk 2. 3 rd edition, revised and expanded. Moskow, Nauchno-tekhnicheskiy tsentr issledovaniya problem promyshlennoy bezopasnosti CJSC Publ., 208 p. (In Russian).
2. Zemenkova, M. Yu. (2019). Metody snizheniya tekhnologicheskikh i ekologicheskikh riskov pri transporte i khranenii uglevodorodov. Tyumen, TIU Publ., 397 p. (In Russian).
3. Shtengauer, O. V. & Shendaleva, E. V. (2015). Otsenka ekologicheskikh riskov pri transportirovke, khranenii nefti i nefteproduktov. Standartizatsiya, metrologiya i upravleniye kachestvom: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii. Omsk, pp. 273-277. (In Russian).
4. Kershenbaum, B. Ya., Grigoriev, L. I. & Shcherban', P. S. (2014). Razrabotka kompleksnogo podkhoda k upravleniyu kachestvom sooruzheniya slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh ob''yektov s ispol'zovaniyem risk-menedzhmenta. Quality Management in Oil and Gas Industry, (2), pp. 9-12. (In Russian).
5. Kolodkin, V. M., Murin, A. V., Petrov, A. K. & Gorsky, V. G. (2001). Kolichestvennaya otsenka riska khimicheskikh avariy. Izhevsk, Udmurtskiy Universitet Publ., 288 p. (In Russian).
6. Roed, W., Mosleh, A., Vinnem, J. E. & Aven, T. (2009). On the Use of Hybrid Causal Logic Method in Offshore Risk Analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 94(2), pp. 445-455. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.003
7. Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A. & Webler, Th. (2001). Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. London: Earthscan. (2001). IRGC (International Risk Governance Coincil). White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards an Integrative Framework. Geneva, International Risk Governance Coincil. (In English).
8. Lees, F. P. (1996). Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Hazard Identification, Assessment, and Control. Volume 3. Oxford, Butterworth Heinemann. (In English).
9. Tetel'min, V. V. & Yazev, V. A. (2009). Zashchita okruzhayushchey sredy v neftegazovom komplekse. Dolgoprudny, Intellekt Publ., 352 p. (In Russian).
10. Khokhlyavin, S. A. (2007). Menedzhment riska: standarty Avstrii, Velikobritanii i Avstralii predtecha budushchego standarta ISO 31000. Mir Standartov, 2(13), pp. 33-38. (In Russian).
11. Kozhova, O. M. & Vorob'yev, V. V. (Eds.) (2000). Metodologiya otsenki sostoyaniya ekosistem. Rostov-on-Don, TSVVR LLC Publ., 128 p. (In Russian).
12. Knight, K. (2003). Chairman ISO/TMB/WG on Risk Management Terminology. Risk Management: an Integral Component of Corporate Governance and Good Management. ISO Bulletin, pp. 21-24. (In English).
13. Aven, T. (2003). Founditions of risk analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. (In English).
14. Goritskiy, V. M., Martynyuk, V. F. & Saygina, Yu. N. (2012). Accident Scenarios During Explosion and Fire in the Tank. Quality Management in Oil and Gas Industry, (2), pp. 40-43. (In Russian).
15. Adams, A. (1992). The UK experience in offshore pipeline operations. Pipes & Pipelines Int., pp. 9-14. (In English).
16. Olender, W. K. (1983). Statistical Failure Mode Analysis of Submarine Pipeline Accidents. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 1983(1), pp. 361-365. (In English).
17. Zanin, A. V., Mil'ke, A. A. & Kvasov, I. N. (2017). Otsenka riska truboprovodnogo transporta uglevodorodov s morskikh neftedobyvayushchikh platform na territorii Arkticheskogo shel'fa. Neft' i gaz Zapadnoy Sibiri: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii. Tyumen, pp. 139-142. (In Russian).
18. Dolodarenko, V. A., Poltoratskaya, V. N., Kaspijcteva, V. Yu., & Falko, V. V. (2007). Estimation of ecological risk on under-plume to gaugings of concentration of polluting substances, which are thrown out by group of dot sources. Ecology and nature management, (10), pp. 174-178. (In Ukrainian).
19. Rukovodstvo po otsenke riska dlya zdorov'ya lyudey i zashchity okruzhayushchey sredy pri ispol'zovanii khimicheskikh smesey. (2008). Mir Standartov, (7(28)), pp. 69-86. (In Russian).
20. Marashi, E., & Davis, J. P. (2016). An argumentation-based method for managing complex issues in design of infrastructural systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 91(12), pp. 1535-1545. (In English). DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.01.013
21. Antip'yev, V. N., & Skakov, I. A. (2013). Otsenka fizicheskikh effektov pri vzryve toplivnovozdushnoy smesi. Quality Management in Oil and Gas Industry, (2), pp. 39-42. (In Russian).
22. Varlamov, D. P. & Steklov, O. I. (2013). Upravleniye riskami ekspluatatsii lineynoy chasti magistral'nykh gazoprovodov, podverzhennykh korrozionnomu rastreskivaniyu pod napryazheniyem. Quality Management in Oil and Gas Industry, (3), pp. 38-44. (In Russian).
23. Kolesnikov, E. Yu. (2010). K voprosu o raschete i normirovanii pozharnykh riskov. Issues of risk analysis, 7(3), pp. 48-79. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Kvasov I.N., Shendaleva I.V., Shtengauer O.V., Zemenkova M.Yu. Prognosis evaluation of environmental risks in case of accident on main and technological oil pipelines. Oil and Gas Studies. 2019;(6):103-117. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31660/0445-0108-2019-6-103-117
Views:
419
Email this article 
Post a Comment 